Purpose
The WART is a clinical test of single and dual-task performance of walking and a working memory task. The original test required walking on a narrow pathway, and the modified version does not require walking on a narrow path.
Acronym
WART
Area of Assessment
Attention & Working Memory
Assessment Type
Performance Measure
Cost
Free
- The protocol for testing includes three components:
1) Single task walking
2) Single task forward digit span testing
3) Dual-task walking while remembering a digit span
- Percent dual-task costs (or benefits) for the cognitive and motor tasks are calculated.
- Difference in dual vs. single task performance is divided by single task performance for each task.
Number of Items
Depends on condition
- Stopwatch
- Marked distance of 20 feet on floor (with or without narrow path, depending on population)
- Protocol for assessing forward digit span
- Sufficiently quiet environment so digit span can be tested without noise interference in single and dual-task conditions
Required Training
Reading an Article/Manual
Instrument Reviewers
Initially reviewed by Karen McCulloch, PT, PhD, NCS and the TBI EDGE task force of the Neurology Section of the APTA in 8/2012.
Professional Association Recommendation
Recommendations for use of the instrument from the Neurology Section of the American Physical Therapy Association’s Multiple Sclerosis Taskforce (MSEDGE), Parkinson’s Taskforce (PD EDGE), Spinal Cord Injury Taskforce (PD EDGE), Stroke Taskforce (StrokEDGE), Traumatic Brain Injury Taskforce (TBI EDGE), and Vestibular Taskforce (Vestibular EDGE) are listed below. These recommendations were developed by a panel of research and clinical experts using a modified Delphi process.
For detailed information about how recommendations were made, please visit: http://www.neuropt.org/go/healthcare-professionals/neurology-section-outcome-measures-recommendations
Abbreviations:
|
|
HR
|
Highly Recommend
|
R
|
Recommend
|
LS / UR
|
Reasonable to use, but limited study in target group / Unable to Recommend
|
NR
|
Not Recommended
|
Recommendations based on level of care in which the assessment is taken:
|
Acute Care
|
Inpatient Rehabilitation
|
Skilled Nursing Facility
|
Outpatient
Rehabilitation
|
Home Health
|
TBI EDGE
|
NR
|
NR
|
NR
|
LS
|
NR
|
Recommendations for use based on ambulatory status after brain injury:
|
Completely Independent
|
Mildly dependant
|
Moderately Dependant
|
Severely Dependant
|
TBI EDGE
|
LS
|
NR
|
NR
|
NR
|
Recommendations for entry-level physical therapy education and use in research:
|
Students should learn to administer this tool? (Y/N)
|
Students should be exposed to tool? (Y/N)
|
Appropriate for use in intervention research studies? (Y/N)
|
Is additional research warranted for this tool (Y/N)
|
TBI EDGE
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Not reported
|
Considerations
The approach has varied with populations tested, keeping the narrow path derived from a study by Lindenberger et al for community dwelling older adults who were high functioning. The narrow path walking proved too difficult for a population of individuals with TBI, who required a wider base of support to walk quickly and were not able to walk with a narrow base of support. Individuals with TBI were able to successfully accomplish working memory task during walking.
The time and quiet space needed to complete the forward digit span testing is a drawback, in some clinical environments it may not be feasible.
Do you see an error or have a suggestion for this instrument summary? Please e-mail us!