Bibliography
Bauman, S., Williams, D., et al. (2007). Physical activity after total joint replacement: a cross-sectional survey. Clin J Sport Med 17(2): 104-108. Find it on PubMed
Beard, D. J., Harris, K., Dawson, J., Doll, H., Murray, D. W., Carr, A. J., & Price, A. J. (2015). Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(1), 73-79. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009.
Dawson, J., Jameson-Shortall, E., et al. (2000). Issues relating to long-term follow-up in hip arthroplasty surgery. The Journal of Arthroplasty 15(6): 710-717.
Fitzpatrick, R., Morris, R., et al. (2000). The value of short and simple measures to assess outcomes for patients of total hip replacement surgery. Quality in Health Care 9(3): 146-150.
Garbuz, D. S., Xu, M., et al. (2006). PatBients' outcome after total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index and the Oxford 12-item hip score. The Journal of Arthroplasty 21(7): 998-1004.
Hamilton, D. F., Giesinger, J. M., Patton, J. T., MacDonald, D. J., Simpson, A. H. R. W., Howie, C. R., & Glesinger, K. (2015). Making the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores meaningful at the patient level through normative scoring and registry data. Bone Joint Research, 4, 137-144. http://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.48.2000524
Harris, K. K., Price, A. J., Beard, D. J., Fitzpatrick, R., Jenkinson, C., & Dawson, J. (2014). Can pain and function be distinguished in the Oxford Hip Score in a meaningful way? An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Bone Joint Research, 3(11), 305-309. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.311.2000313
Holmenlund, C., Overgaard, S., Bilberg, R., & Varnum, C. (2021). Evaluation of the Oxford Hip Score: Does it still have content validity? Interviews of total hip arthroplasty patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19(1), 237. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01869-8
Impellizzeri, F. M., Mannion, A. F., Naal, F. D., & Leunig, M. (2015). Validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness of the Oxford Hip Score in patients undergoing surgery for femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy, 31(1), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.022
Kalairajah, Y., Azurza, K., et al. (2005). Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties--a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score. The Journal of Arthroplasty 20(8): 1037.
Larsson, A., Rolfson, O., & Kärrholm, J. (2019). Evaluation of Forgotten Joint Score in total hip arthroplasty with Oxford Hip Score as reference standard. Acta Orthopaedica, 90(3), 253-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1599252
Martinelli, N., Longo, U. G., et al. (2011). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation with reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Italian version of the Oxford Hip Score in patients with hip osteoarthritis. Qual Life Res 20(6): 923-929. Find it on PubMed
Martin-Fernandez, J., Gray-Laymón, P., Molina-Siguero, A., Martínez-Martín, J., García-Maroto, R., García-Sánchez, I., García-Pérez, L., Ramos-García, V., Castro-Casas, O., & Bilbao, A.(2017). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Oxford Hip Score in patients with hip osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1568-3
Murray, D., Fitzpatrick, R., et al. (2007). The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume 89(8): 1010-1014.
Naal, F. D., Impellizzeri, F. M., von Eisenhart‐Rothe, R., Mannion, A. F., & Leunig, M. (2012). Reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness of the hip outcome score in patients with end‐stage hip osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 64(11), 1770–1775. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21746
Paulsen, A., Odgaard, A., et al. (2012). Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the Oxford hip score: Assessed against generic and disease-specific questionnaires. Bone Joint Res 1(9): 225-233. Find it on PubMed
Pynsent, P., Adams, D., et al. (2005). The Oxford hip and knee outcome questionnaires for arthroplasty OUTCOMES AND STANDARDS FOR SURGICAL AUDIT. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume 87(2): 241-248.
Sabah, S. A., Alvand, A., Beard, D. J., & Price, A. J. (2022). Minimal important changes and differences were estimated for Oxford hip and knee scores following primary and revision arthroplasty. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 143, 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.016.
Tugay, B. U., Tugay, N., Guney, H., Hazar, Z., Yuksel, I., & Atilla, B. (2015). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the Oxford hip score. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 135(7), 879-889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2215-9
University of Oxford. (2016, June 4). The Oxford Hip Score. Oxford University Innovation. https://innovation.ox.ac.uk/outcome-measures/oxford-hip-score-ohs/
Weel, H., Lindeboom, R., Kuipers, S. E., & Vervest, T. M. J. S. (2017). Comparison between the Harris- and Oxford Hip Score to evaluate outcomes one-year after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 83(1), 98-109